Score your institution
A quick way to see where your institution stands. You rate each of the nine domains on two simple 1–5 scales, and the tool turns that into a single headline score with suggested next steps. Takes about ten minutes; your answers stay on this device.
For all nine domains, pick a Maturity (how formal) and Coverage (how widespread) from 1 to 5.
Each domain gets a color-coded band, and everything rolls up into one headline number for the whole institution.
The lowest-scoring domains surface as priorities, with concrete next steps to bring to your committee.
You only enter the first two — Maturity and Coverage. The tool derives the rest.
How sophisticated and formalized the governance is. 1 = ad hoc, 5 = optimized and continuously improving.
How broadly it is deployed across applicable units. 1 = under 10%, 5 = 75–100% (enterprise-wide).
The big number on each row. Multiplying rewards depth and reach — high scores need both.
Institutional AI Governance Index — your single headline number, the average GES across all scored domains. It answers “how mature is our AI governance overall?”
Average GES across scored domains · {{ assessComplete }} domains scored
{{ floorText }}
All nine domains scored — ready to share with your governance committee.
A self-assessment is a conversation starter, not an audit. Score it with a cross-functional team, and revisit quarterly to track movement.
{{ a.type }}
{{ a.d }}
{{ c.name }}
{{ c.d }}
CAGMA’s contribution: domain-specific maturity + a coverage dimension + a higher-ed governance taxonomy.
{{ s }}